United States District Court, S.D. Illinois
October 4, 2005.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff,
CHRISTOPHER B. TAYLOR, Defendant.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: DAVID HERNDON, District Judge
On September 20, 2005, Defendant Christopher B. Taylor filed a
pro se Motion for a New Trial. (Doc. 161.) This Motion was
opposed by the government. (Doc. 164.) On October 4, 2005,
Defendant filed an Amended Motion for a New Trial, again pro
se. (Doc. 169.)
Despite filing both of his motions pro se, Defendant was
represented by counsel on each occasion. On September 20th
Defendant was represented by Attorneys John Stobbs, II and
Christopher Threlkeld, and on October 4th Defendant was
represented by Attorney Phillip J. Kavanaugh, III. As the Court
has previously explained to Defendant, this Court will not accept
pro se motions by a Defendant who is represented by counsel.
Therefore, the Court DENIES Defendant's Motions for a New Trial, without prejudice. (Docs. 161, 169.)
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2005 VersusLaw Inc.