Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

U.S. v. TAYLOR

United States District Court, S.D. Illinois


October 4, 2005.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff,
v.
CHRISTOPHER B. TAYLOR, Defendant.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: DAVID HERNDON, District Judge

ORDER

On September 20, 2005, Defendant Christopher B. Taylor filed a pro se Motion for a New Trial. (Doc. 161.) This Motion was opposed by the government. (Doc. 164.) On October 4, 2005, Defendant filed an Amended Motion for a New Trial, again pro se. (Doc. 169.)

Despite filing both of his motions pro se, Defendant was represented by counsel on each occasion. On September 20th Defendant was represented by Attorneys John Stobbs, II and Christopher Threlkeld, and on October 4th Defendant was represented by Attorney Phillip J. Kavanaugh, III. As the Court has previously explained to Defendant, this Court will not accept pro se motions by a Defendant who is represented by counsel. Therefore, the Court DENIES Defendant's Motions for a New Trial, without prejudice. (Docs. 161, 169.)

  IT IS SO ORDERED.

20051004

© 1992-2005 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.