Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

JACKSON v. MOTE

United States District Court, S.D. Illinois


August 9, 2005.

ADRIAN L. JACKSON, Petitioner,
v.
STEPHEN D. MOTE, Respondent.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: CLIFFORD PROUD, Magistrate Judge

ORDER

Before the Court is petitioner's pro se "Motion to Supplement Response to Respondent[`s] Motion to Dismiss." (Doc. 49). Petitioner's "motion" is actually a response to the motion to dismiss (Doc. 38). The Court assumes petitioner is concerned that the Court will ignore his pro se response in favor of the response filed by his counsel (before counsel was granted leave to withdraw).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall have the record reflect that petitioner's pro se "Motion to Supplement Response to Respondent[`s] Motion to Dismiss" (Doc. 49) is his "supplemental response" to respondent's motion to dismiss (Doc. 38).

  IT IS SO ORDERED.

20050809

© 1992-2005 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.