Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

HORTON v. POWERS

United States District Court, S.D. Illinois


August 8, 2005.

EUGENE HORTON, Plaintiff,
v.
MARVIN POWERS, et al., Defendants.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: J. PHIL GILBERT, District Judge

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("Report") (Doc. 57) of Magistrate Judge Philip M. Frazier recommending that the Court deny plaintiff Eugene Horton's motion for a temporary restraining order or preliminary or permanent injunction and request to dispense with the security requirement (Docs. 45 & 46).

After reviewing a magistrate judge's report and recommendation, the Court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations of the magistrate judge in the report. Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). The Court must review de novo the portions of the report to which objections are made. Id. "If no objection or only partial objection is made, the district court judge reviews those unobjected portions for clear error." Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999).

  The Court has received no objection to the Report. The Court has reviewed the entire file and finds that the Report is not clearly erroneous. Accordingly, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Report in its entirety (Doc. 57) and DENIES the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order or preliminary or permanent injunction and request to dispense with the security requirement (Docs. 45 & 46).

  IT IS SO ORDERED.

20050808

© 1992-2005 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.