United States District Court, S.D. Illinois
June 10, 2005.
JOHNNY M. RUFFIN, JR., Plaintiff,
GUY PIERCE and KAREN McKINNEY, Defendants.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: CLIFFORD PROUD, Magistrate Judge
Before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Make
Interlineation (Correction) to His Response and Opposition to
Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment Instanter. (Doc. 231).
The Court accepts plaintiff's representation that he made a
mistake in drafting his original response, and will permit
plaintiff to amend his response. However, the Court does not
allow amendment by interlineation. If plaintiff desires to amend
his response, he must file an amended response.
Upon consideration and for good cause shown, Plaintiff's Motion
for Leave to Make Interlineation (Correction) to His Response and
Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment Instanter
(Doc. 231) is GRANTED. Plaintiff is granted leave to file an
amended response to defendants' motion for summary judgment, making
the change indicated in his motion, on or before June 30, 2005.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2005 VersusLaw Inc.