Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

RUFFIN v. PIERCE

United States District Court, S.D. Illinois


June 10, 2005.

JOHNNY M. RUFFIN, JR., Plaintiff,
v.
GUY PIERCE and KAREN McKINNEY, Defendants.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: CLIFFORD PROUD, Magistrate Judge

ORDER

Before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Make Interlineation (Correction) to His Response and Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment Instanter. (Doc. 231).

The Court accepts plaintiff's representation that he made a mistake in drafting his original response, and will permit plaintiff to amend his response. However, the Court does not allow amendment by interlineation. If plaintiff desires to amend his response, he must file an amended response.

  Upon consideration and for good cause shown, Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Make Interlineation (Correction) to His Response and Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment Instanter (Doc. 231) is GRANTED. Plaintiff is granted leave to file an amended response to defendants' motion for summary judgment, making the change indicated in his motion, on or before June 30, 2005.

  IT IS SO ORDERED.

20050610

© 1992-2005 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.