Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

BRENNAN v. AT&T CORP.

United States District Court, S.D. Illinois


June 7, 2005.

EDWARD BRENNAN, ANNIE CRAWFORD, KATHLEEN MITTELSTEADT, SUZANNE McGEE, and DEANE STOKES, JR., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs,
v.
AT&T CORP., a New York Corporation, Defendant.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: DAVID HERNDON, District Judge

ORDER

Before the Court is Defendant AT&T Corp.'s motion for leave to file (1) a corrected memorandum in support of its motion to compel arbitration and dismiss and (2) a corrected declaration of Ellen Reid. (Doc. 92.) The corrected documents Defendant seeks to file contain corrections regarding only two background facts and do not affect the merits of Defendant's arguments. Plaintiffs do not oppose Defendant's motion. (Doc. 94.) Therefore, the Court GRANTS Defendant's motion. (Doc. 92.) The Court STRIKES Defendant's motion to compel arbitration and dismiss and its supporting memorandum (Docs. 87, 88) and GRANTS LEAVE to Defendant to refile its corrected motion, memorandum, and attachments. The time Plaintiff has to respond will be calculated from the date Defendant refiles its motion, memorandum, and attachments.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20050607

© 1992-2005 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.