United States District Court, S.D. Illinois
June 7, 2005.
EDWARD BRENNAN, ANNIE CRAWFORD, KATHLEEN MITTELSTEADT, SUZANNE McGEE, and DEANE STOKES, JR., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs,
AT&T CORP., a New York Corporation, Defendant.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: DAVID HERNDON, District Judge
Before the Court is Defendant AT&T Corp.'s motion for leave to
file (1) a corrected memorandum in support of its motion to
compel arbitration and dismiss and (2) a corrected declaration of
Ellen Reid. (Doc. 92.) The corrected documents Defendant seeks to
file contain corrections regarding only two background facts and
do not affect the merits of Defendant's arguments. Plaintiffs do
not oppose Defendant's motion. (Doc. 94.) Therefore, the Court
GRANTS Defendant's motion. (Doc. 92.) The Court STRIKES
Defendant's motion to compel arbitration and dismiss and its
supporting memorandum (Docs. 87, 88) and GRANTS LEAVE to
Defendant to refile its corrected motion, memorandum, and attachments. The time Plaintiff has to respond will be calculated
from the date Defendant refiles its motion, memorandum, and
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2005 VersusLaw Inc.