United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division
October 18, 2004.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff,
RYAN EVANS, Defendant.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: MILTON SHADUR, Senior District Judge
Federal Defender Program staff attorney John Murphy has filed,
on behalf of recently convicted defendant Ryan Evans ("Evans"), a
motion for a judgment of acquittal pursuant to Fed.R. Crim. P.
("Rule") 29(c) and a concurrent motion for a new trial pursuant
to Rule 33. Evans' conviction came in his second trial on seven
counts that stemmed from his having traded in four publicly-owned
stocks (three of which were involved in tender offers) as the
tippee of confidential information at the first trial, although
he was acquitted on a count charging conspiracy with the tipper,
he dodged the bullet on the seven substantive counts (with the
jurors having indicated that they were 11 to 1 for conviction on
those seven charges).
All of the matters raised by Evans' two motions appear to be
essentially restatements of issues that were raised during the
course of trial and were resolved by this Court adversely to Evans' position.*fn1 In all events, this Court finds the
contentions advanced on Evans' behalf to be without merit. Both
motions are denied.