JONES v. HARRISON

The opinion of the court was delivered by: JAMES MORAN, Senior District Judge

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Plaintiff Lois Jones entitles her most recent motion to reconsider our decision denying her petition to proceed in forma pauperis, her "Final Motion to Reconsider." One can only hope. The record reveals plaintiff's penchant for filing motions to reconsider and motions to vacate. This motion, plaintiff's fourth attempt to vacate our ruling, incorrectly identifies the case number as "03C7330." In fact, that is the number for another case brought by plaintiff, which is before Judge Guzman. On the same day that we denied plaintiff's last motion for reconsideration in this case, Judge Guzman also denied a motion for reconsideration filed by plaintiff in that case. In his minute order denying plaintiff's motion, Judge Guzman cautioned plaintiff that any further motions to reconsider would be summarily denied. As we have sufficiently explained the basis for our decision in our previous opinions, see Memorandum Opinion and Orders dated May 13, 2004, May 27, 2004, August 6, 2004, and September 16, 2004, and plaintiff again failing to state any basis for reconsideration, see Bordelon v. Chicago School Reform Board of Trustees, 233 F.3d 524, 529 (7th Cir. 2000), we once more deny her motion and alert her that any such future motions will be summarily denied. CONCLUSION

Plaintiff's motion to reconsider is denied.

20041005