Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

U.S. v. MANCARI

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff,
v.
BRUNO MANCARI, Defendant.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: JOHN GRADY, Senior District Judge

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before the court is defendant's motion for an evidentiary hearing pursuant to Franks v. Delaware. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is denied.

BACKGROUND

  On January 8, 2002, a Cook County Circuit Court judge issued a warrant to search defendant Bruno Mancari's home. The warrant application was supported by the affidavit of Cook County Sheriff's Office Investigator Louis Schubrych and made in connection with the investigation of the murder of Joseph Russo. That same day, officers searched Mancari's home and recovered a .38 caliber Derringer. Mancari was later charged with Russo's murder and ultimately acquitted.

  Mancari has since been indicted for being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922 (g) (1). This charge is based on the gun found in Mancari's home during the execution of the search warrant on January 8, 2002. By his present motion, Mancari seeks a hearing pursuant to Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154, 98 S.Ct. 2674, 57 L.Ed.2d 667 (1978) to establish his claim that the affidavit submitted in support of the search warrant was tainted by the intentional omission of material information.

  The affidavit identifies Schubrych, the affiant, as an investigator assigned to the Russo murder case, and begins with the following background information. Russo was murdered in April 1985. He was found in the trunk of his own car, and had been beaten and stabbed to death. Russo had been out on bond on a narcotics arrest and shortly before the murder had received a federal grand jury subpeona for testimony regarding a criminal investigation of Mancari. FBI Agent Wayne Zydron had told Schubrych that Mancari was an auto dealer "linked" to an auto theft ring and that Russo had been enlisted to obtain phony car titles.

  Schubrych's affidavit states that a James Palaggi had informed Schubrych that Mancari had approached Palaggi and asked him to kill Russo. Palaggi "declined this contract," and Mancari later told him (Palaggi) that someone named "Murph" or "Murph the Surf" would do the murder. Schubrych identified "Murph" as Harold Merryfield.

  The affidavit states that from December 1995 through February 1996, Merryfield provided detailed information to both the FBI and state prosecutor Matt Mahoney regarding the Russo murder.*fn1 Merryfield had been an "enforcer" for Mancari — paid to threaten and beat people — since 1981. In March 1985, Mancari approached Merryfield and asked him to beat Russo. Merryfield agreed. On the arranged date, Mancari lured Russo to Merryfield's mother's house by telling Russo that he (Mancari) had lined up one of his customers to purchase cocaine from Russo. Prior to Russo's arrival, Mancari and another man showed up at the house and Mancari told Merryfield to leave because he would not be needed for the beating. Merryfield left the house and when he returned a couple of hours later, he found Mancari and the other unidentified man standing over Russo's dead body. Mancari said to Merryfield: "Clean this shit up and call me tomorrow." Mancari and the other man then left. Merryfield then loaded the body into the trunk of Russo's car and parked it in a public parking lot. Merryfield found six ounces of cocaine in Russo's sock, which Mancari later told him to keep as payment for disposing of the body. Merryfield discarded a bloody hammer, but kept two bloody knives because he thought his mother would notice their absence. Merryfield "recently admitted" that a friend named Peter Fisher helped him remove Russo's body from the house. Fisher has been located and admitted the same.

  The affidavit further states that Merryfield told Schubrych that while he was in a Wisconsin state prison in 2001 (on an unrelated charge) he was in contact with Mancari. Merryfield would have his daughter, Tammy Merryfield, contact Mancari by telephone, using the fictitious name "Joanne." Upon hearing from "Joanne," Mancari would either visit Merryfield or write to him using Tammy Merryfield's name as the sender and an old address of Merryfield's mother as the return address. Prison officials verified that Mancari had visited Merryfield on October 5, 2001 and that Merryfield had received a check for $500 on October 26, 2001. Some time later, Merryfield received another check for $100.

  The affidavit goes on to describe how, in cooperating with the investigation, Merryfield and his daughter agreed to place a recorded telephone call to Mancari for the purposes of arranging another visit. On November 27, 2001, Mancari received a telephone call from "Joanne" and agreed to visit Merryfield on November 30, 2001. Merryfield agreed to have the meeting recorded on audio and video tape. During the recorded meeting between Mancari and Merryfield, there were several references made to the Russo murder investigation and Mancari agreed to send Merryfield $5,000 for his legal fees. They agreed that Mancari would send a money order to Merryfield in prison by registered mail.

  Approximately one week later, on December 6, 2001, a $5,000 bank check was sent to Merryfield in prison by certified mail. The check was dated December 4, 2001 — five days after Mancari's visit — and was enclosed in an envelope identifying Tammy Merryfield as the sender and listing an outdated address of Merryfield's mother. The face of the check did not indicate who had actually paid for it. The check was drawn on the "First Midwest Bank," which was located approximately one and a half miles from one of Mancari's auto dealerships. Bank security indicated that the check sent to Merryfield was part of a multi-part form with two copies behind the original. These copies are often kept by the sender as a personal receipt for the check amount.

  Based on the information in Schubrych's affidavit, state investigators sought a warrant to search Mancari's home for: "[A]ny official check receipts from the December 4, 2001 $5,000.00 check and any other check receipts or bank withdrawal records mailed from Bruno Mancari to Harold Merryfield along with any additional correspondence or financial transaction that Bruno Mancari and Harold Merryfield may have had relative to the murder of Joseph Russo."

  DISCUSSION

  A search warrant may only be issued upon a showing of probable cause. See U.S. Const., amend. IV. An affidavit submitted in support of a warrant establishes probable cause if it "sets forth facts sufficient to induce a reasonably prudent person to believe that a search . . . will uncover evidence of a crime." United States v. McNeese, 901 F.2d 585, 592 (7th Cir. 1990). When deciding whether an affidavit supports a finding of probable cause, "[t]he task of the issuing magistrate is simply to make a practical, common sense decision whether, given all the circumstances set forth in the affidavit before [said magistrate], . . . there is a fair probability ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.