Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

MATA v. ILLINOIS STATE POLICE

August 16, 2004.

Mata
v.
Illinois State Police.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: JAMES ZAGEL, District Judge

Plaintiffs Joseph Mata and Leonard Sakoda have filed complaints against the Illinois State Police defendants, alleging national origin discrimination and/or retaliation for, among other things, Defendants' failure to promote them. Although these cases have not been formally consolidated, the parties have been conducting discovery simultaneously. To avoid duplicity of effort and expense and to prevent the possibility of inconsistent rulings, I have agreed, for now, to consolidate these cases for the purposes of this motion only. My ruling is as follows:
A. Documents Requested by Sergeant Mata
1. Documents Regarding Shift Selections/Changes
Plaintiff has requested all policies and contracts pertaining to shift selection and involuntary shift changes. Defendants claim that all relevant documents have either been produced or have been adequately represented in the ISP Defendants' depositions. To the extent that Defendants have in their possession documents containing non-duplicative information, I order that it be produced.

2. Documents Regarding Plaintiff's MCS Contracts/Inspections and CVEO Duties

  Plaintiff requests the MCS contracts/inspections for District 15 from 1993 through 1998. Defendants claim that information from the years prior to 1998 are irrelevant because Mata did not receive a CVEO position until after 1998. To allow for comparison, I order the production of information from 1996-1998.

  Plaintiff also seeks information regarding CVEO pay, duties, and selection criteria. Defendant asserts that it has produced all relevant documents in its possession except for a CVEO handbook, which Mata should have already had in his possession. For this reason, I see no need to order any further production.

  3. Personnel Documents Regarding All Troopers Promoted to Sergeant or "By Passed" For Promotion to Sergeant in 1998

  Plaintiff requests the annual job performance evaluations and promotional evaluations for all Troopers in District 15 who were either promoted or "by-passed" for promotion in 1998. Defendant has produced selected evaluations. Since these evaluations may be relevant to the establishment of Plaintiff's prima facie case, I order them produced in their entirety absent claims of a protective order.

  4. Defendants' Personnel Files

  Plaintiff requests the personnel files of the named Defendants. Defendants claim that since none of the named Defendants have been parties to race or national origin discrimination suits, the files are irrelevant. I tend to agree with the Defendants. I will, however, order an in camera inspection of any documents which pertain to allegations of race or national origin discrimination. This order also applies to the personnel files sought by Plaintiff Sakoda.

  5. Evidence of Other Acts of Discrimination

  Plaintiff is seeking evidence or testimony pertaining to all claims of harassment and discrimination. Defendants object on the grounds that claims of harassment not involving race or national origin are irrelevant to this case. Because I agree with Defendants arguments, I will not order production of documents outside those pertaining to race and national origin discrimination.

  6. Records After June 1999

  Plaintiff also requests records that post-date his departure from District 15. Defendant objects to the documents as irrelevant since Plaintiff has not alleged wrongdoing against his subsequent District, District 16. I think personnel ratings received by Mata after the move may be relevant for comparison purposes and order that they be produced.

  B. Documents Requested by ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.