Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

U.S. v. BROWN

August 13, 2004.

U.S.
v.
SHAUN BROWN.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: ROBERT GETTLEMAN, District Judge

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

This matter came before the court on defendant's motion to dismiss indictment or, alternatively, to strike surplusage from indictment, and defendant's alternative motion to bifurcate proceedings, along with the government's motions in limine and other pretrial matters. For the reasons stated in open court this date, the court makes the following rulings:
1. The court grants the government's motion in limine regarding uncharged drug activity based on Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b).
2. The court denies the government's motion in limine regarding obstruction of justice. Further, the court will not permit the government to introduce, either in its case in chief or in a bifurcated sentencing proceeding, any evidence of obstruction of justice based on defendant's flight prior to the scheduled retrial of Count 1 of the indictment.
3. The court grants defendant's motion to dismiss indictment or, alternatively, to strike surplusage from indictment in part. The "sentencing allegations" of the superceding indictment dated July 27, 2004, are stricken. 4. In addition, the court will allow a special interrogatory to the jury with respect to item no. 2 in the "sentencing allegations" concerning the 17 kilograms of cocaine alleged to have been possessed by defendant during the course of the commission of the conduct on November 15, 200, alleged in the indictment. However, although in granting the government's first motion in limine the court will allow evidence of uncharged drug activity under Evidence Rule 404(b), the court will not allow the jury to consider, for sentencing purposes, the possession or distribution of any quantity of cocaine above the 17 kilograms at issue in the charged conduct involving the November 15, 2000, transaction.
5. The court grants the oral motion by the government to continue the trial date from August 16, 2004, to a date in the future after the court receives guidance from the United States Supreme Court in United States v. Booker and United States v. Fanfan. In addition, for the same reasons, the court grants the government's motion to exclude time under the Speedy Trial Act. See 18 U.S.C. ยงยง 3161(h)(8)(A), (B)(ii). The court notes that defendant vigorously objected to the continuance of the trial and answered ready for trial on the charged count involving the November 15, 2000, transaction. The court nevertheless determines that the interest of justice compels a continuation of the trial because of the uncertainty of the law involving the Supreme Court's decision in Blakely v. Washington, ___ U.S. ___, 2004 WL 1402697 (June 24, 2004), which the Supreme Court is likely to clarify in its expected expeditious rulings in Booker and Fanfan. In addition, defendant will suffer no prejudice as a result of this continuation of the trial because he has already been convicted in the initial trial of this case of the money laundering counts (Counts 2 and 3) and was in state custody when he was ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.