Searching over 5,500,000 cases.

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.


May 25, 2004.


The opinion of the court was delivered by: JOHN W. DARRAH, District Judge


Plaintiff, Louis V. Nese, filed a suit against Defendants, Nordic Conduction Services, Inc. and Administaff, Inc., alleging: (1)that Nordie violated the American with Disabilities Act ("ADA") by reducing Plaintiffs wages and terminating Plaintiff because he had epilepsy and that Administaff assisted, after the fact, in creating anon — discriminatory explanation for Nordic's actions (Count 1); (2) that those actions allegedly taken by the Defendants also violated the Rehabilitation Act (Count IT); and (3) that Nordic fraudulently induced Plaintiff into relinquishing his involvement with the Downers Grove Chamber of Commerce and the "Lodge" (Count 111). Presently before the Court is Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment.


  Defendant, Julian & Nordic Industries, Inc. ("Nordic"), incorrectly identified as Nordic Construction Services, Inc., is a general contractor in the business of providing commercial and residential general contractor services, as well as fire and water damage restoration services. (Def.'s 56.1(a)(3) Statement ¶ 1). Administaff Companies II, L.P. ("Administaff') is a professional personnel management services company. (Id., ¶ 2). Nese is a forty-three-year-old male who began having seizures when he was fifteen years old. (Def.'s 56.1(a)(3) Statement ¶¶ 4, 7). Because of his seizures, Nese has taken prescription medication for approximately twenty-seven years. (Id., ¶ 8). Nese does not experience any side effects from his medications. (Id., ¶ 14), Prior to his work with Nordic, Nese worked as a carpenter for various employers, including Handy Andy and Builders Square. (Id., ¶ 10), Nese did not have any seizures during his employment with Nordic, (Id., ¶ 11).

  From approximately 1991 to 1998, Nese was on disability and unable to work in any capacity due to constant seizures relating to his condition of epilepsy. (Plaint's 56.1(b)(3) Statement ¶ 2). In approximately 1997, Nese came off of social security disability. Since that time, Nese's seizure disorder has not affected his ability to work or his quality of work. (Def.'s 56.1(a)(3) Statement ¶¶ 12-13).

  After coming off of social security disability, Nese worked for his own construction company, L & N Builders ("L & N"). L & N became incorporated in approximately 1998. L & N did remodeling jobs. (Def.'s 56.1(a)(3) Statement ¶ 15). From 1997 until Nese began working for Nordic, Nese did not work for anyone except L & N. (Id., ¶ 16). At times, L & N lost money. (Id., ¶ 17). In the year prior to accepting employment with Nordic, Nese was the only employee of L & N. Nese could not find employees to stay and work for L & N even though he had advertised for employees in newspapers. (Id., ¶ 18). At one point, Nese had to turn away $40,000 in business because he did not have any employees. (Id., ¶ 19). In August 2000, when Nordic offered Nese a job, Nordic had given Nese a number of subcontracting jobs. (Id., ¶ 20). After Nese joined Nordic, he did not intend to keep L & N as a viable corporation. (Id., ¶ 21). Nordic never asked Nese to make certain that L & N was no longer viable. (Id., ¶ 22). Prior to starting employment with Nordic, Nese was a member of the Downers Grove Chamber of Commerce and a member of a business — networking group called the Lodge, Only one construction contractor was allowed to be a member in the Lodge. (Def.'s 56.1(a)(3) Statement ¶ 24). Nese's membership in the Lodge was as the construction contractor. (Plaint's 56.1(b)(3) Statement ¶ 5). Prior to August 31, 2000, Tom Julian, Nordic's owner and president, was also a member of the Lodge, At that time, Julian did not participate in the Lodge as a construction contractor. (Def.'s 56. 1(a)(3) Statement ¶ 25). Julian was instrumental in Nese's joining the Chamber of Commerce and the Lodge. (Id., ¶ 30). Julian told Nese that he wanted Nese's seat on the Lodge as the construction contractor. Nese told Julian that everyone in the Lodge knew Nese and asked Julian if he could remain in the Lodge and attend the meetings on behalf of Nordic. (Plaint's 56.1(a)(3) Statement ¶ 6). Julian's membership in the Lodge was for a cleaning service that Julian owned, (Id., ¶ 7)

  The Lodge is a group of 20 to 25 members from different businesses who get together to give each other leads for new business opportunities. The group meets once a week, (Def.'s 56.1(a)(3) Statement ¶ 27). To join the Lodge, the potential new member must get a current member to bring in the new member. It costs $75 per month to be in the Lodge. (Id. ¶ 28). The Lodge only allows one member per business category. Julian was the founder of the Lodge. (Plaint's 56.1(b)(3) Statement ¶ 9).

  Between 1998 and 2000, Nese and Julian were friends and had a business relationship in which they assisted each other in generating business. (Def.'s 56.1(a)(3) Statement ¶ 29). From the time that Nese joined the Lodge until his termination from Nordic, Nese earned between $8,000 and $12, 000 from business generated from activities with the Lodge. This business came from two sources — work completed in Nese's accountant's home and subcontracting work from Julian's fire damage restoration company. (Id., ¶ 31). Prior to Nese's accepting employment with Nordic, Julian told Nese that he would have to relinquish his seat in the Lodge once he accepted employment with Nordic, (Plaint's 56.1(b)(3) Statement ¶ 11),

  After obtaining employment with Nordic in August 2000, Nese decided not to renew his membership in the Chamber of Commerce. He made this decision because he was working for Nordic and did not want to spend $280 for the membership. (Def.'s 56.1(a)(3) Statement ¶ 33). Nese also decided that he did not need to generate business from the Lodge because he now worked for Nordic. Within a few weeks of starting his employment with Nordic, Nese gave up his membership in the Lodge. (Id., ¶ 34). With Nese's consent, Julian took Nese's place in the Lodge, (Id., ¶ 35).

  In 1998 or 1999, Julian first offered Nese a job with Nordic. Nese did not accept the position. (Def.'s 56.1(a)(3) Statement ¶ 36). In August 2000, Julian again wanted to hire Nese for a job with Nordic. At that time, Nese informed Julian that he was unable to drive to work because he did not have a driver's license because he had epilepsy. Nese's inability to drive was a factor in his search for employees for L & N, When Nese told Julian that he had epilepsy, Julian's response indicated that he did not consider such to be a factor in Nese's employment. Subsequently, Julian hired Nese and provided another employee to drive Nese until Nese was able to obtain his driver's license. (Id., ¶ 38). At the time Julian offered Nese a job, Julian told Nese that the offer would allow Nese to work with a team, take pressure off of Nese in terms of finding work, and provide Nese with benefits. (Id., ¶ 39). Because Nese was only doing subcontracting work for Nordic and Nese was having a difficult time finding employees, Nese accepted a position with Nordic. (Id., ¶ 41). Julian also told Nese that Nese would no longer have to worry about having a job. (Plaint.'s 56. 1(b)(3) Statement ¶ 17).

  Nordic hired Nese as a carpenter on August 31, 2000, at the rate of $22.50 per hour. (Def.'s 56. 1(a)(3) Statement ¶ 43). When Nese joined Nordic, Julian informed him that he would have a 90 — day trial period to see if Julian wanted to retain him at Nordic. (Id., ¶ 46).

  As a carpenter for Nordic, Nese gutted out fire-damaged rooms in homes and remodeled such areas. He performed rough and finish carpentry work, including putting up drywall, replacing windows, putting in trim, and putting in cabinets. (Def.'s 56.1(a)(3) Statement ¶ 48). Nese also did roofing work. (Id., ¶ 49),

  Effective February 28, 2001, Nese's hourly rate was reduced to $18,00 per hour. (Def.'s 56, 1(a)(3) Statement ¶ 50). Nese's wage was changed because his work pace was not up to the standards of his peers. (Id., ¶ 51). Nese believes that Julian told him his wage was reduced because other workers were making less than Nese and that it was causing a problem. (Id., ¶ 52). Prior to his reduction in pay, Nese's supervisor, Gary Boerma, never commented to or made complaints to Nese regarding deficiencies in Nese's productivity. (Plaint.'s 56.1(b)(3) Statement ¶ 18). Boerma testified that he did speak to Nese on multiple occasions concerning problems with Nese's work. (Boerma's Dep. pp, 45-46, 54-59). When Nese's hourly rate was decreased to $18.00 per hour, Julian completed an Employee Status Change form, which did not contain any comments relating to the pace of Nese's work. (Plaint.'s 56.1(b)(3) Statement ¶ 46). At some time, the form was amended; and the comment "Work pace is not to standards of peers" was added. Julian is unsure whether he altered the form the year following the March 12, 2001 date that he originally completed and signed the form, (Id., ¶ 48).

  Nordic believed that Nese's pace was deficient, and Nordic personnel had numerous concerns and conversations regarding Nese's work pace, (Def.'s 56. 1(a)(3) Statement ¶ 54), Nese believed that his work "may not have been exactly" like other workers, but it "was comparable," (Nese Dep. p, 145). During his employment, Nese's supervisor, Gary Boerma, asked Nese, as well as other workers, to pick up his pace. (Def.'s 56.1(a)(3) Statement ¶¶ 56-57). Of three instances in which Boerma asked Nese to pick up his pace, one was a general address to all employees; and two were to Nese personally, (Id., ¶ 59). Nese believed that he was made the scapegoat for cost overruns and the length of time it took to complete projects because everyone around Boerma was either family or had been around for years. (Id., ¶ 64), Nese also believes that Julian asked him twice, following his decrease in pay, whether ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.