United States District Court, N.D. Illinois
January 21, 2004.
City of Chicago
The opinion of the court was delivered by: JAMES ZAGEL, District Judge
Defendant City of Chicago has moved to strike allegations 11, 12, 13,
and 16 of Plaintiff Airtran Airways, Inc.'s Complaint, pursuant to
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(f).
The motion to strike allegation 11 is granted because the allegation is
compound. Airtran is ordered to re-plead as 11a, 11b, etc. The motion to
strike allegation 12 is granted.
The motion to strike allegation 13 is granted in the same respect as it
was to allegations 11 and 12.
The motion to strike allegation 16 is denied.
For the reasons above, the City's Motion to Strike Allegations 11, 12,
13 and 16 is GRANTED as to allegations 11, 12 and 13 but DENIED as to
© 1992-2004 VersusLaw Inc.