Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

INTERLEASE AVIATION INVESTORS

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois


January 16, 2004.

INTERLEASE AVIATION INVESTORS (ALOHA) L.L.C., an Illinois Limited Liability Company, INTERLEASE AVIATION INVESTORS (TACA) L.L.C., an Iowa Limited Liability Company, and MIMI LEASING CORP., an Iowa Limited Liability Company, Plaintiffs,
v.
VANGUARD AIRLINES, INC., a Delaware Corporation; PEGASUS AVIATION, INC., a Foreign Corporation; VANGUARD ACQUISITION COMPANY; AIRLINE INVESTMENTS, INC.; SEABURY GROUP, LLC, a New York Limited Liability Company; and RICHARD S. WILEY, Defendants

The opinion of the court was delivered by: EDWARD BOBRICK, Magistrate Judge

MEMORANDUM ORDER

This matter came before the court on Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel filed December 31, 2003, the court orders as follows:

Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel (Plaintiffs' Motion) is granted in part and denied in part as stated below: Page 2

  1. Plaintiffs' Motion is granted in part and denied in part with respect to Request Nos. 1 and 2 of Plaintiffs' Third Request for Production of Documents. Defendants will only be required to produce documents reflecting the sale or purchase of a Boeing 737 aircraft by defendant Pegasus Aviation, Inc. that occurred between January of 2001 and December of 2002. Such documents will be produced with an "Attorneys' Eyes Only" designation under the Protective Order entered on January 23, 2003.

  Notwithstanding that designation, plaintiff's counsel will not reveal these documents to Monica Carroll without providing prior written notice to defendants' counsel. Such notice shall be provided to defendants' counsel at least seven business days before any such disclosure.

  Should plaintiffs' expert or experts utilize the information contained in these documents, they will do so without revealing the source of the information. Any reference to the information in papers filed by plaintiffs or plaintiffs' experts will be accompanied by a footnote stating that the parties stipulate to the authenticity of the information. The defendants' motion is denied in all other respects.

  2. Plaintiffs' Motion is denied with respect to compelling defendants to produce a 30(b)(6) witness pursuant to plaintiffs' December 3, 2003 Notice of Deposition. Defendants will, by January 23, 2004, produce printouts of the directory structures of Vanguard related documents downloaded from their document file servers. Page 3

  3. Plaintiffs' Motion is denied with respect to Request Nos. 20, 34, 38, and 40 of Plaintiffs' Second Request for Production of Documents the parties agreeing that the issues are moot.

20040116

© 1992-2004 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.