Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

04/05/89 the People of the State of v. Craig J. Znaniecki

April 5, 1989

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE

v.

CRAIG J. ZNANIECKI, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT



APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS, THIRD DISTRICT

537 N.E.2d 16, 181 Ill. App. 3d 389, 130 Ill. Dec. 195 1989.IL.482

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Putnam County; the Hon. Robert J. Cashen, Judge, presiding.

APPELLATE Judges:

PRESIDING JUSTICE WOMBACHER delivered the opinion of the court. STOUDER and SCOTT, JJ., concur.

DECISION OF THE COURT DELIVERED BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE WOMBACHER

The defendant appeals the trial court's denial of his petition to rescind his summary suspension.

On May 7, 1988, the defendant was charged with driving under the influence of alcohol and notified of the statutory suspension of his driving privileges. He petitioned the trial court to rescind the statutory summary suspension.

The arresting officer, Bouxsein, stated that the vehicle driven by the defendant ran into a tree. There were two other passengers in the defendant's vehicle as well as a cooler containing five empty beer cans.

At the hospital, the defendant admitted to earlier drinking beer. The officer noted the defendant's speech was coherent and he responded to questions appropriately; nevertheless, he smelled of alcohol. After requesting blood from the defendant, Bouxsein arrested the defendant for DUI. He read the defendant his rights from a card entitled "Implied Consent Warnings." This card was admitted as an exhibit during this hearing. The defendant indicated he understood the warnings.

Following this hearing, the trial Judge denied the defendant's petition to rescind the statutory summary suspension and this appeal follows.

The defendant claims he was not properly warned by the arresting officer of the resulting consequences if he submitted to a blood test which revealed an alcohol concentration of 0.10 or greater. We agree and reverse the statutory summary suspension.

According to the Illinois Vehicle Code, a rudimentary issue at a summary suspension hearing is whether the defendant was properly advised by the arresting officer that his privilege to operate a motor vehicle would be suspended if he refused to submit to and complete the test or tests requested or he submitted to a chemical test or tests, and such tests disclosed a BAC of 0.10 or more. Ill. Rev. Stat. 1987, ch. 95 1/2, par. 2-118.1.

Section 11 -- 501.1(c) of the Illinois Vehicle Code provides in relevant part as follows:

"A person requested to submit to a test . . . shall be warned by the law enforcement officer requesting the test that a refusal to submit to the test will result in the statutory summary suspension of such person's privilege to operate a motor vehicle as provided in Section 6-208.1 of this Code. The person shall also be warned by the law enforcement officer that if the person submits to the test or tests . . . and the alcohol concentration in such person's blood or breath is 0.10 or greater, a statutory summary suspension of such person's privilege to operate a motor vehicle, ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.