APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS, FIRST DISTRICT, FIRST DIVISION
530 N.E.2d 1061, 176 Ill. App. 3d 91, 125 Ill. Dec. 652 1988.IL.1582
Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Robert Sklodowski, Judge, presiding.
JUSTICE O'CONNOR delivered the opinion of the court. BUCKLEY and QUINLAN, JJ., concur.
DECISION OF THE COURT DELIVERED BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE O'CONNOR
This is an appeal from an order granting defendant Jewel Companies' motion to strike class action allegations from plaintiffs' second amended complaint. Interlocutory appeal was allowed pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 308. (107 Ill. 2d R. 308.) The following questions were certified for appeal:
"(1) Whether the trial court erred under section 2 -- 801 of the Illinois Code of Civil Procedure in granting defendant's motion to strike class allegations on the grounds that:
Any common questions of law in this case are overshadowed by both questions of fact and particular applications of the law that would exist as to these franchisees.
Each plaintiff, and therefore class member thereafter, would have to prove that White Hen Pantry's conduct caused his business injury.
Any class action herein therefore would require . . . hundreds of new trials.
As pronounced in the Getz [ sic ] case and the Rice case before that, the point is that a class cannot be certified where the claimed injury would require an individual analysis of causation.
. . . favorable ruling as to a named plaintiff will not necessarily establish a right of recovery in the other class members.
(2) Whether the court's July 17, 1987 Order striking the class allegation from plaintiffs' second amended complaint was proper."
The procedural history of this litigation is set out below, in somewhat abbreviated form. Pertinent factual material about the parties which was the basis for the trial court's class action determination is addressed in our ...