Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

In Re Marriage of Nelson

OPINION FILED OCTOBER 30, 1984.

IN RE MARRIAGE OF THOMAS NELSON, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, AND TYRA LAURIE NELSON, RESPONDENT-APPELLEE.


Appeal from the Circuit Court of Lake County; the Hon. Alphonse Witt, Judge, presiding.

JUSTICE NASH DELIVERED THE OPINION OF THE COURT:

In these consolidated cases petitioner, Thomas Nelson, appeals from orders of the circuit court of Lake County which registered a judgment of dissolution of his marriage to respondent, Tyra Nelson, originally entered in Lee County, and undertook enforcement proceedings.

The issues presented by these appeals are whether an order registering and enrolling a judgment for dissolution of marriage entered in another judicial circuit of this State is a final appealable order and whether such registration was properly done in this instance.

The marriage of the parties was dissolved in the circuit court of Lee County (Fifteenth Judicial Circuit) in February 1983; a property settlement agreement was incorporated into the judgment and the wife awarded custody of their two minor children. In August 1983 the wife filed a petition in the circuit court of Lake county (Nineteenth Judicial Circuit) requesting that the judgment be registered pursuant to section 511(b) of the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1983, ch. 40, par. 511(b)). After summons was issued and served upon the husband in Lee County, he filed a motion to vacate the petition for registration, alleging Lake County was not the proper venue as he resided in Lee County. The trial court found that respondent and the children resided in Lake County and that section 511(b) of the Act provided for registration of judgments from another judicial circuit in this State; it ordered enrollment of the judgment in Lake County. The husband sought reconsideration, noting he resided in Lee County where the judgment of dissolution has been entered and section 512 of the Act required that post-judgment venue remain in Lee County. The motion to reconsider was denied, and the trial court found there was no reason to delay enforcement or appeal as set forth in Supreme Court Rule 304(a) (87 Ill.2d R. 304(a)). The husband filed a notice of appeal (No. 83-786) which the wife has moved to dismiss in this court, asserting the order from which he appeals was not a final order. We have taken that motion with the case.

On November 15, 1983, during the pendency of that appeal, the wife filed a petition for rule to show cause in the circuit court of Lake County alleging the husband had failed to pay for certain dental expenses of the children required by the judgment of dissolution. The husband's request that the trial court stay that matter pending the appeal of the venue issue was denied. The wife's petition that the husband be restrained from proceeding in the Lee County circuit court with a petition to enjoin her from proceeding in Lake County was granted, and the trial court further awarded the wife a judgment for $304 for dental expenses of their daughter. The husband also appeals from these orders (No. 83-1088).

No. 83-786

We consider first whether an order registering a judgment for dissolution of marriage from another judicial circuit in Illinois is a final and appealable order.

The procedures to be followed in order to enforce or seek modification of a judgment of dissolution in Illinois are as set forth in section 511 of the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1983, ch. 40, par. 511). Where the judgment was entered in a different judicial circuit of this State than that in which enforcement is sought, section 511(b) provides that a party "shall commence the proceeding by filing a petition establishing the judgment and attaching a copy of the judgment as a part of the petition." The statutory language does not suggest that the mere filing of the petition is itself a cause of action, and it appears to be only a procedural step necessary to commence a post-judgment proceeding for enforcement of a judgment of another circuit. As such, an order allowing a petition to register the judgment cannot be deemed a final appealable order.

In similar context, it has been established that a denial of a change of venue from one county to another (Mexicali Club, Inc. v. Illinois Liquor Control Com. (1976), 31 Ill. App.3d 797, 799, 347 N.E.2d 190, 192) or an order transferring a cause from one court or division to another (Peter G. Georges, Inc. v. Feldon Building Corp. (1978), 61 Ill. App.3d 631, 636, 377 N.E.2d 1102) are not final orders and thus are not appealable. See Executive Commercial Services, Ltd. v. Daskalakis (1979), 74 Ill. App.3d 760, 768, 393 N.E.2d 1365, cert. denied (1980), 446 U.S. 967, 64 L.Ed.2d 826, 100 S.Ct. 2945.

• 1 We find that the order granting registration and enrollment of the Lee County judgment in Lake County was not a final order under Supreme Court Rule 303 (87 Ill.2d R. 303) as it did not adjudicate any of the rights of the parties under the judgment for dissolution thus enrolled. Nor did the insertion by the trial court in its order of language required by Supreme Court Rule 304(a) (87 Ill.2d R. 304(a)) to authorize interlocutory appeal of a final judgment where there are multiple parties or claims make this non-final order appealable. Chicago Title & Trust Co. v. Guaranty Bank & Trust Co. (1978), 59 Ill. App.3d 362, 364, 375 N.E.2d 522.

We conclude that appeal No. 83-786 must be dismissed.

No. 83-1088

In this appeal the husband again seeks review of the order registering the Lee County judgment in Lake County and, also, the subsequent proceedings to enforce it in that jurisdiction.

Post-judgment venue for proceedings to enforce or modify a judgment of dissolution of marriage is provided for by section 512 of the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.