Not what you're
looking for? Try an advanced search.
Buy This Entire Record For
CZARNOWSKI v. DESOTO
July 29, 1981
GREGORY I. CZARNOWSKI, PLAINTIFF,
DESOTO, INC., DEFENDANT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Flaum, District Judge:
1. Plaintiff is a citizen of the United States who resides
in Chicago, Illinois.
2. Defendant is a corporation with an office located at
1700 Mt. Prospect Road, Des Plaines, Illinois, who employs
more than fifteen persons in the business of manufacturing and
distributing paint and other wall coverings in interstate
3. Plaintiff was employed by defendant from August 17, 1970
to August 15, 1973.
4. During the period relevant to this cause of action,
defendant was an employer engaged in an industry affecting
commerce within the meaning of title VII. See 42 U.S.C. § 2000e(b),
(g), and (h) (1978).
5. Defendant hired plaintiff as a salesman in defendant's
"wall covering division" on August 17, 1970.
6. On or about February 1, 1973, defendant transferred
plaintiff to defendant's "chemical coatings division" as a
field merchandise representative under the supervision of John
Nitz ("Nitz"), manager of the field merchandise group. The
field merchandise group trains the paint department personnel
of Sears, Roebuck, and Company.
7. On or about August 2, 1973, Nitz asked plaintiff to
leave, stating that plaintiff was too aggressive and that Nitz
had not seen any improvement in plaintiff's performance as a
field merchandise representative.
8. On August 10, 1973, Nitz wrote a letter to plaintiff as
a follow-up to their conversation on August 2, 1973. Nitz
stated in the letter that the letter was formal notice of
plaintiff's termination on or about September 2, 1973. The
letter also states that, if the plaintiff so wished, defendant
would provide plaintiff with a letter of recommendation and
would assist plaintiff in producing a resume.
9. On August 14, 1973, plaintiff met with defendant's
personnel supervisor, Diana Parks, for an exit interview.
Plaintiff signed an "exit interview form" which stated that
plaintiff's resignation was "due to lack of mutual
understanding of position objectives and functions."
10. On August 15, 1973, plaintiff met with defendant's
merchandise director, Stevenson Mountsier ("Mountsier").
Plaintiff requested the meeting to inform Mountsier of the
nature of plaintiff's leaving the employ of defendant and to
advise Mountsier of the status of the field merchandise group.
11. At the time that plaintiff left defendant's employ,
plaintiff was receiving an annual salary of $13,560 from
defendant, plus other benefits including pension and ...
Buy This Entire Record For