Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

In Re Loitra

OPINION FILED DECEMBER 31, 1979.

IN RE RICHARD LOITRA, A MINOR. — (THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, PETITIONER-APPELLEE,

v.

IRENE LOITRA LASHAY, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.)



APPEAL from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. ARTHUR N. HAMILTON, Judge, presiding.

MR. JUSTICE RIZZI DELIVERED THE OPINION OF THE COURT:

Rehearing denied March 24, 1980.

Respondent Irene Loitra LaShay appeals from a circuit court order terminating her parental rights to her minor son, Richard Loitra, and appointing a guardian with the right to consent to his adoption. We reverse and remand.

On February 13, 1976, a petition for adjudication of wardship was filed in juvenile court alleging that Richard Loitra was neglected as to the care necessary for his well-being and that his environment was injurious to his welfare (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1975, ch. 37, par. 702-4(1)(a), (b)). Richard was born on May 27, 1974. The petition listed Irene Loitra as the child's mother; no person was listed as the father.

Mrs. LaShay failed to appear at the adjudicatory hearing on May 10, 1976. At that hearing, a social worker for the Department of Children and Family Services (DCFS) testified that, according to respondent's sister, Mrs. LaShay had left Richard alone with her for two months and had not sought his return. The boy allegedly had bruises and marks on his back and chest when he was left with her. Respondent's sister further related to the social worker that the mother did not know the identity of the father. The sister then turned custody of Richard over to the DCFS.

After only one worker testified, the court entered a finding of "neglect" under section 702-4(1)(b), stating that "the record should indicate abuse." The court further made "a finding of best interest [and] adjudication of wardship, a finding of unfitness and best interest pursuant to Section 5-7." In the dispositional hearing, the court appointed Richard Layman of DCFS as guardian (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1975, ch. 37, pars. 702-4(1)(b), 705-7).

On December 22, 1978, a petition for appointment of a guardian for Richard with the right of adoption was filed. The petition alleged, inter alia, that Mrs. LaShay was an "unfit person" under section 1D(m) of the Adoption Act and section 5-9 of the Juvenile Court Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1977, ch. 40, par. 1501(D)(b) & (m) & ch. 37, par. 705-9). On March 21, 1979, a trial was held on the petition. Three caseworkers testified for the State. The first caseworker, Joan Phillips, related the allegations that Mrs. LaShay's sister made to DCFS, including: Richard was brought to her with bruises, the mother was usually drunk, the mother had been a dope addict and the mother had an arrest record.

A second caseworker, Betty Vinig, testified that Mrs. LaShay visited Richard on several occasions. She urged the mother to attend counseling sessions, which Mrs. LaShay did not do because of work commitments. Ms. Vinig testified that Mrs. LaShay said she got married in order that Richard would have a father; however, the marriage did not last very long. According to Ms. Vinig, Mrs. LaShay did not keep several of her scheduled counseling appointments.

Julie Johnson, a third caseworker, testified as to six out of nine scheduled visits Mrs. LaShay had with Richard. On one occasion, Ms. Johnson said she smelled alcohol on the mother's breath.

At the close of the State's case, defense counsel's motion for a directed verdict was denied. However, the State dropped the ground of unfitness which was based on a failure to demonstrate a reasonable degree of interest, concern or responsibility to the child (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1977, ch. 40, par. 1501D(b)).

Mrs. LaShay testified that she got married in order to provide a father for Richard and to expedite obtaining the custody of her son. She testified that she worked two jobs, seven days a week, thereby making it difficult to attend counseling sessions. The court sustained the State's objection to defense counsel's questioning of Mrs. LaShay as to whether she drank to excess while Richard was in her custody. She did testify, however, that she no longer drank.

The court took judicial notice of the prior adjudicatory hearing and the finding of abuse. The court then found that Richard's parents were unfit because they failed to make reasonable efforts to correct the conditions which were the basis of removal and to make reasonable progress toward the return of the child within 12 months after adjudication of neglect (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1977, ch. 40, par. 1501D(m). Lastly, the court held that it was in Richard's best interests that parental rights be terminated. A guardian was then appointed with the right to consent to Richard's adoption.

Respondent first contends that the trial court erred in finding her unfit pursuant to section 1D(m) of the Adoption Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1977, ch. 40, par. 1501D(m)). That section provides:

"`Unfit person' means any person whom the court shall find to be unfit to have a child sought to be adopted, the ground ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.