Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Cohon & Associates, Ltd. v. Citizens Cas. Co.

DECEMBER 27, 1971.

EDWARD M. COHON & ASSOCIATES, LTD., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

CITIZENS CASUALTY COMPANY OF NEW YORK, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE.



APPEAL from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. EDWARD F. HEALY, Judge, presiding.

MR. PRESIDING JUSTICE ENGLISH DELIVERED THE OPINION OF THE COURT:

Plaintiff, Edward M. Cohon & Associates, Ltd., an Illinois corporation, as named insured against professional errors and omissions in a policy issued to it by defendant, brought this action for declaratory judgment to obtain from the court a direction to defendant that it both defend and indemnify plaintiff, in accordance with the terms of the policy, against a claim then being asserted against it by one Grizely in another action.

The only defensive pleading was a motion to dismiss on two grounds: (1) that defendant was already defending Edward M. Cohon individually in the Grizely suit, and that the true party in interest as plaintiff was therefore Aetna Insurance Company; *fn1 and (2) that while defendant had issued its professional errors and omissions policy to plaintiff, before the relief sought by the complaint could be authorized, a jury in the Grizely case would have to determine that plaintiff had been guilty of a professional error or omission.

After hearing the arguments of counsel on the motion to dismiss, the court entered the following order from which plaintiff has appealed:

"It Is Ordered that Citizens Casualty Company of New York, and the Aetna Insurance Company shall both defend Edward M. Cohon in cause Nos. 67L3865 and 67L5272. All other relief requested in the complaint herein be and it is hereby denied."

• 1 Bearing in mind that defendant's motion admitted the truth of all facts well pleaded in plaintiff's Amended Complaint (Acorn Auto Driving School v. Bd. of Educ., 27 Ill.2d 93), the substantive effect of this order may be broken down into eight points for the convenience of our consideration:

"(1) Plaintiff is not an insured under defendant's policy which is the subject of this declaratory action.

(2) The claim of Grizely does not come within the provisions of that policy.

(3) Defendant is not obliged to defend plaintiff against the Grizely claim.

(4) Nor is defendant obliged to indemnify plaintiff against the Grizely claim.

(5) Defendant shall defend Edward M. Cohon individually in the Grizely case (67L3865).

(6) Aetna Insurance Company shall do likewise.

(7) Both said insurance companies shall also defend Edward M. Cohon individually in case No. 67L5272 ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.