Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

ALLEGRETTI v. UNITED STATES

July 26, 1967

JAMES ALLEGRETTI, PETITIONER,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RESPONDENT.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Robert D. Morgan, District Judge.

OPINION AND ORDER

This cause arises on a motion under Section 2255, Title 28, United States Code, to vacate or modify sentences. On July 13, 1967 the motion was docketed as a Civil Action pursuant to Memo No. 337 of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts.

Section 2255 (Title 28, United States Code) requires hearing on a motion thereunder "[u]nless the motion and the files and records of the case conclusively show that the prisoner is entitled to no relief". The motion here does not charge lack of jurisdiction to impose the sentences, or that the sentences were in excess of the maximum authorized by law, or that when imposed they were subject to collateral attack of any kind. The judgment of this court was affirmed and the validity of the sentences was not questioned on appeal (7 Cir., 340 F.2d 254, cert. den. 381 U.S. 911, 85 S.Ct. 1531, 14 L.Ed.2d 433).

It seems clear that the motion does not attack the sentences as imposed, but rather as they are being executed. Thus it appears that the motion itself does show conclusively that no relief is available thereon. Freeman v. United States, 103 U.S.App.D.C. 15, 254 F.2d 352 (1958). See also Halprin v. United States, 295 F.2d 458 (9th Cir. 1961) and Darnell v. Looney, 239 F.2d 174 (10th Cir. 1956). The manner in which a defendant may have been treated by prison officials, even before sentence but after a plea of guilty, does not afford a basis for relief under Section 2255. United States v. Koptik, 300 F.2d 19, 23 (7th Cir. 1962), cert. den. 370 U.S. 957, 82 S.Ct. 1609, 8 L.Ed.2d 823.

Accordingly, the pending Motion to Vacate or Modify Sentence is denied, as is the motion ancillary thereto.

Judgment is so ordered.

19670726

© 1992-2003 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.