Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Jamieson v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

November 9, 1965

CHARLES W. JAMIESON, PETITIONER,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT



Schnackenberg, Castle and Kiley, Circuit Judges.

Author: Schnackenberg

SCHNACKENBERG, Circuit Judge.

Charles W. Jamieson, taxpayer, has by his petition asked us to review the decision of the Tax Court of the United States denying him a $600 deduction as an exemption for his wife on his separate income tax return for the year 1960.

During 1960 he was a 75-year-old retired lawyer and his wife was 61 years old. His separate income tax return stated that his wife was a bookkeeper and that she was filing a separate return. However, he deducted $600 as a personal exemption for his wife, as well as $1200 as two exemptions for himself, i. e., the regular personal exemption and the exemption allowed a taxpayer who is 65 years of age or over.

The Tax Court made findings embodying the foregoing facts, inter alia.

In this court taxpayer relies upon the following as propositions of law:

"Whether or not a taxpayer expending $2500.00 per year in entire support of himself and his wife, his dependent, can claim said wife, his dependent, when charging off onehalf of the above expenditure for her support and claiming an exemption for that charge-off, under proper interpretation of the intent of the Congress, and the Code Secs. 151(b) and 152(a) 9 as liberally construed by case law and mixed law and fact theories; the Code under Title 26, and Supplements thereto, United States Supreme Court case law, that of the Courts of Appeals, District Courts and Illinois case law where applicable; please see index.

"Regulations Sec. 1 152-1(a)(2) defines support as food, shelter, medical care and the like. This broad term and the like is, this Court will doubtlessly agree, sufficient to cover appellant's needs in his favor whereever arbitrarily held against appellant and, has latitude sufficient to help prove his case. (Such liberal verbiage is used in the instruction sheets 1964)."

We believe the controlling question before us is largely determined by the provisions of 26 U.S.C.A. ยงยง 151 and 152, which, insofar as pertaining hereto, we set forth below.

Sec. 151. Allowance of Deductions for Personal Exemptions

(a) Allowance of deductions. -- In the case of an individual, the exemptions provided by this section shall be allowed as deductions in computing taxable income.

(b) Taxpayer and spouse. -- An exemption of $600 for the taxpayer; and an additional exemption of $600 for the spouse of the taxpayer if a separate return is made by the taxpayer, and if the spouse, for the calendar year in which the taxable year of the taxpayer begins, has no gross income and is not the dependent of another taxpayer.

Sec. 152. Dependent Defined.

(a) General definition. -- For purposes of this subtitle, the term "dependent" means any of the following individuals over half of whose support, for the calendar year in which the taxable year of the ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.